NFL scores › Week 8 › Bears at Seahawks
BEAVERUnder 46.5, leanleanSEA −3, leanleanBEAVER gives SEA 61% to win
Lines
Tap a price to add it to your slip. Circled is BEAVER’s pick: solid for a best bet, dashed for a lean.SpreadTotalMoney
Bears
Seahawks
Bears
SeahawksBEAVER’s card
LeanUnder 46.5, lean0.7 points off the line
- SEA −3 lean, 0.6 points off the line
BEAVER against the market
Updates until kickoff| BEAVER | Market | Call | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score (CHI–SEA) | 21–25 | – | |
| Spread | SEA −3.6 | SEA −3 | SEA −3 |
| Total | 45.8 | 46.5 | Under 46.5 |
| SEA win chance | 61% | −170 |
CHI by 8+
19%
CHI by 1–7
20%
SEA by 1–7
24%
SEA by 8+
37%
Spread: 0.6 pts better than Vegas for Seahawks (sides with a gap this size have won 48% in the backtest). Total: 0.7 pts below Vegas (50% historically).
Player projections
typical game, with the likely range (middle half of outcomes) · ▲ 5%+ above his usual · all player props Chicago Bears | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Yds | ||
| Caleb Williams QB | 228179–271 | ||
| Rushing | Yds | ||
| D'Andre Swift RB | 5136–68 | ||
| Caleb Williams QB | 219–34 | ||
| Roschon Johnson RB | 50–15 | ||
| Receiving | Rec | Yds | |
| Colston Loveland TE | 4.23–6 | 4527–69 | |
| Luther Burden III WR | 4.02–6 | 4525–79 | |
| Rome Odunze WR | 3.12–4 | 4122–68 | |
| Kalif Raymond WR | 2.21–3 | 197–35 | |
| D'Andre Swift RB | 2.61–4 | 176–29 | |
Seattle Seahawks | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Yds | ||
| Sam Darnold QB | 263188–318▲ | ||
| Rushing | Yds | ||
| Emanuel Wilson RB | 4828–72 | ||
| George Holani RB | 113–26 | ||
| Velus Jones Jr. RB | 40–14 | ||
| Receiving | Rec | Yds | |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR | 6.14–8 | 7344–112 | |
| Cooper Kupp WR | 2.51–4 | 2811–46 | |
| AJ Barner TE | 2.91–5 | 2712–49 | |
| Rashid Shaheed WR | 1.61–3 | 163–35 | |
| Tory Horton WR | – | 80–25 | |
Tale of the tape
BEAVER Stats, opponent-adjusted, entering the game. Rank among 32 NFL teams.Efficiency
+0.069 #6Offense EPA / play−0.040 #23
−0.016 #12Defense EPA / play allowed−0.132 #1
+3.0% #6Offense success rate−0.9% #18
−0.3% #14Defense success rate allowed−5.6% #1
+0.102 #6Passing EPA / dropback+0.017 #15
−0.067 #6Pass defense EPA allowed−0.140 #2
+0.025 #12Rushing EPA / carry−0.113 #32
+0.056 #28Rush defense EPA allowed−0.123 #1
+0.052 #10Early-down EPA (1st & 2nd)−0.036 #22
+0.053 #29Early-down EPA allowed−0.084 #2
Scoring and special teams
+2.1 #8Scoring offense (pts vs avg)+2.1 #7
−0.5 #13Scoring defense (pts vs avg)−3.8 #2
+0.92 #2Special teams EPA / game+1.40 #1
Touchdown scorers
▲ good matchup vs. his usual · full TD board
Chicago Bears52% of the team's carries inside the 10
24% of the team's end-zone targets
34% of the team's end-zone targets
Seattle Seahawks55% of the team's end-zone targets
45% of the team's carries inside the 10
Quarterbacks
career EPA per dropback (league average is about 0; older seasons count less)
PROJECTED STARTER · Bears
Caleb Williams
EPA per dropback +0.03

PROJECTED STARTER · Seahawks
Sam Darnold
EPA per dropback +0.02
Injury report
players listed Out, Doubtful or Questionable this weekThe injury report for this game isn’t out yet (teams file them Wednesday through Friday).
Bears: last 5 games
Seahawks: last 5 games
| W20-3 | Covered | |
| L14-17 | Missed | |
| L29-32 | Missed | |
| W30-23 | Push | |
| L31-33 | Missed |
Rating trend
BEAVER Stats: net EPA per play against an average team, entering each weekCHISEA
Loading the thread…
The box score fills in after the game.
Lines
Tap a price to add it to your slip. Circled is BEAVER’s pick: solid for a best bet, dashed for a lean.SpreadTotalMoney
Bears
Seahawks
Bears
SeahawksLines
latest from each book| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | SEA −3 | 46.5 | CHI +142 · SEA −170 |
| BEAVER fair line | SEA −3.6 | 45.8 | CHI +156 · SEA −156 |
Loading…
Tendencies
Season to date. Against the spread and over/under use closing lines.| CHI | SEA | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-2 | Record | 4-3 |
| 3-1 | Home | 3-1 |
| 2-1 | Away | 1-2 |
| 5-2 | Against the spread | 2-3 |
| 3-4 | Over/under | 3-4 |
| 25.7 / 20.4 | Points for / against | 24.0 / 17.9 |
| +5.3 | Avg margin | +6.1 |









