College football scores › Week 8 › Texas Tech at Cincinnati
BEAVER TTU −11.5, lostBEAVER Over 57.5, wonBEAVER had TTU 78% to win
BEAVER against the market
Locked at kickoff, graded on the closing line| BEAVER | Sam | Market | Result | Call | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score (TTU–CIN) | 35–23 | 33–26 | – | 24–37 | |
| Spread | TTU −12.7 | TTU −7.3 | TTU −11.5 | CIN by 13 | TTU −11.5 ✗ |
| Total | 58.0 | 59.6 | 57.5 | 61 | Over 57.5 ✓ |
| CIN win chance | 22% | – | +330 | Won |
TTU by 14+
47%
TTU by 1–13
32%
CIN by 1–13
17%
CIN by 14+
5%
Spread: 1.2 pts better than Vegas for Texas Tech (sides with a gap this size have won 51% in the backtest). Total: 0.5 pts above Vegas (52% historically).
Tale of the tape
BEAVER Stats, opponent-adjusted, entering the game. Rank among 138 FBS teams.Efficiency
+0.042 #42Offense EPA / play+0.133 #19
−0.152 #11Defense EPA / play allowed+0.120 #111
+4.7% #24Offense success rate+2.7% #44
−6.4% #10Defense success rate allowed+4.3% #108
+0.124 #32Rushing EPA / play+0.151 #23
+0.065 #43Passing EPA / play+0.097 #34
−0.130 #17Rush defense EPA allowed+0.085 #96
−0.165 #12Pass defense EPA allowed+0.208 #117
+8.0 #16Scoring offense (pts vs avg)+2.8 #43
−6.4 #23Scoring defense (pts vs avg)+2.1 #77
Situational
+6.8% #11Passing-down success (3rd & long)+1.9% #34
−3.0% #38Passing-down success allowed+3.9% #109
+0.54 #35Points per drive+0.31 #48
−0.81 #23Points per drive allowed+0.36 #83
Trenches
+0.24 #44Line yards per rush+0.45 #18
−0.35 #23Line yards per rush allowed+0.26 #109
−1.1% #81Runs stuffed at the line−4.2% #27
+3.3% #29Opponent runs stuffed−2.0% #102
+0.2% #105Havoc allowed (TFL, sacks, PBU)−5.0% #12
+1.7% #28Havoc created−0.5% #66
Big plays
+0.063 #45Rushing explosiveness+0.196 #7
−0.100 #131Passing explosiveness+0.098 #74
+0.33 #14Open-field yards per rush+0.26 #23
+0.006 #66Pass explosiveness allowed−0.081 #33
Style and schedule
55% #66Run rate60% #25
−4.8 #62Strength of schedule (avg opponent)−6.3 #68
Texas Tech: last 5 games
| W53-25 | Covered | |
| W29-7 | Covered | |
| W49-14 | Covered | |
| W28-26 | Missed | |
| W35-24 | Missed |
Cincinnati: last 5 games
| L42-45 | Missed | |
| L7-34 | Missed | |
| W31-26 | Covered | |
| W35-31 | Missed | |
| W62-10 | Covered |
Rating trend
BEAVER Stats: net EPA per play against an average team, entering each weekTTUCIN
Loading the thread…
No box score for this game yet.
Closing lines
the last line before kickoff| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | TTU −11.5 | 57.5 | TTU −425 · CIN +330 |
| BEAVER fair line | TTU −12.7 | 58.0 | TTU −363 · CIN +363 |
Loading…
Tendencies
Season to date. Against the spread and over/under use closing lines.| TTU | CIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-1 | Record | 5-2 |
| 3-1 | Conference | 2-2 |
| 4-0 | Home | 5-0 |
| 2-1 | Away | 0-2 |
| 3-4 | Against the spread | 4-3 |
| 5-2 | Over/under | 5-2 |
| 35.9 / 20.4 | Points for / against | 35.4 / 26.4 |
| +15.4 | Avg margin | +9.0 |
| -6.5 | Avg vs. the spread | +4.3 |
| 63.9 | Plays per game (excl. garbage time) | 61.1 |











