College football scores › Week 8 › Texas A&M at Alabama
BEAVER ALA −13.5, lostBEAVER Over 50.5, wonBEAVER had ALA 84% to win
BEAVER against the market
Locked at kickoff, graded on the closing line| BEAVER | Sam | Market | Result | Call | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score (TA&M–ALA) | 18–34 | 17–37 | – | 20–31 | |
| Spread | ALA −16.0 | ALA −20.2 | ALA −13.5 | ALA by 11 | ALA −13.5 ✗ |
| Total | 52.0 | 53.6 | 50.5 | 51 | Over 50.5 ✓ |
| ALA win chance | 84% | – | −575 | Won |
TA&M by 14+
3%
TA&M by 1–13
13%
ALA by 1–13
29%
ALA by 14+
55%
Spread: 2.5 pts better than Vegas for Alabama (sides with a gap this size have won 51% in the backtest). Total: 1.5 pts above Vegas (52% historically). Opened ALA −2.5.
Tale of the tape
BEAVER Stats, opponent-adjusted, entering the game. Rank among 138 FBS teams.Efficiency
+0.019 #57Offense EPA / play+0.193 #7
−0.077 #27Defense EPA / play allowed−0.196 #4
+2.1% #47Offense success rate+7.8% #10
−4.9% #20Defense success rate allowed−8.6% #6
+0.081 #42Rushing EPA / play+0.197 #10
−0.004 #60Passing EPA / play+0.210 #12
−0.080 #28Rush defense EPA allowed−0.273 #1
−0.133 #19Pass defense EPA allowed−0.095 #26
+2.3 #48Scoring offense (pts vs avg)+14.4 #4
−7.3 #21Scoring defense (pts vs avg)−10.7 #5
Situational
+0.6% #46Passing-down success (3rd & long)+2.1% #32
−6.4% #10Passing-down success allowed−6.4% #11
+0.80 #22Points per drive+1.68 #7
−0.85 #19Points per drive allowed−1.43 #2
Trenches
+0.28 #40Line yards per rush+0.47 #14
−0.18 #39Line yards per rush allowed−1.02 #1
−4.0% #34Runs stuffed at the line−4.2% #29
+0.9% #51Opponent runs stuffed+8.3% #4
−3.3% #30Havoc allowed (TFL, sacks, PBU)−0.8% #84
+0.3% #46Havoc created+3.5% #10
Big plays
−0.001 #79Rushing explosiveness+0.083 #36
−0.055 #124Passing explosiveness+0.173 #45
−0.24 #85Open-field yards per rush+0.51 #8
+0.032 #79Pass explosiveness allowed+0.081 #98
Style and schedule
56% #58Run rate55% #71
−2.5 #41Strength of schedule (avg opponent)+9.5 #2
Texas A&M: last 5 games
| W41-0 | Missed | |
| L6-27 | Missed | |
| W34-7 | Covered | |
| L6-35 | Missed | |
| L21-31 | Missed |
Alabama: last 5 games
| L10-26 | Missed | |
| L17-20 | Missed | |
| W56-23 | Covered | |
| W49-18 | Covered | |
| W50-36 | Missed |
Rating trend
BEAVER Stats: net EPA per play against an average team, entering each weekTA&MALA
Loading the thread…
No box score for this game yet.
Closing lines
the last line before kickoff| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | ALA −13.5 | 50.5 | TA&M +425 · ALA −575 |
| BEAVER fair line | ALA −16 | 52.0 | TA&M +535 · ALA −535 |
Loading…
Tendencies
Season to date. Against the spread and over/under use closing lines.| TA&M | ALA | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-4 | Record | 6-2 |
| 1-4 | Conference | 4-2 |
| 4-1 | Home | 4-1 |
| 0-3 | Away | 2-1 |
| 4-4 | Against the spread | 4-4 |
| 3-5 | Over/under | 6-2 |
| 28.2 / 18.9 | Points for / against | 38.2 / 21.2 |
| +9.4 | Avg margin | +17.0 |
| -3.6 | Avg vs. the spread | +4.8 |
| 59.8 | Plays per game (excl. garbage time) | 57.6 |











