College football scores › Week 6 › Texas A&M at Missouri
BEAVER TA&M +3.5, lostBEAVER Under 50.5, wonBEAVER had MIZ 56% to win
BEAVER against the market
Locked at kickoff, graded on the closing line| BEAVER | Sam | Market | Result | Call | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score (TA&M–MIZ) | 23–26 | 18–34 | – | 6–27 | |
| Spread | MIZ −2.4 | MIZ −15.8 | MIZ −3.5 | MIZ by 21 | TA&M +3.5 ✗ |
| Total | 49.2 | 52.6 | 50.5 | 33 | Under 50.5 ✓ |
| MIZ win chance | 56% | – | −205 | Won |
TA&M by 14+
15%
TA&M by 1–13
29%
MIZ by 1–13
33%
MIZ by 14+
23%
Spread: 1.1 pts better than Vegas for Texas A&M (sides with a gap this size have won 51% in the backtest). Total: 1.3 pts below Vegas (52% historically). Opened MIZ −1.5.
Tale of the tape
BEAVER Stats, opponent-adjusted, entering the game. Rank among 138 FBS teams.Efficiency
+0.027 #52Offense EPA / play+0.093 #26
−0.050 #37Defense EPA / play allowed−0.136 #9
+2.6% #43Offense success rate+2.4% #45
−4.2% #20Defense success rate allowed−7.7% #6
+0.066 #55Rushing EPA / play+0.035 #69
+0.027 #50Passing EPA / play+0.186 #16
−0.153 #14Rush defense EPA allowed−0.196 #4
+0.083 #84Pass defense EPA allowed−0.067 #27
+4.9 #30Scoring offense (pts vs avg)+4.6 #34
−8.0 #11Scoring defense (pts vs avg)−5.9 #20
Situational
+2.1% #39Passing-down success (3rd & long)+1.9% #40
−5.2% #15Passing-down success allowed−5.1% #16
+0.64 #27Points per drive+0.48 #36
−1.01 #9Points per drive allowed−0.76 #17
Trenches
+0.31 #32Line yards per rush+0.12 #66
−0.24 #29Line yards per rush allowed−0.73 #5
−3.3% #54Runs stuffed at the line−2.1% #66
+2.5% #36Opponent runs stuffed+7.8% #4
−3.3% #31Havoc allowed (TFL, sacks, PBU)−1.0% #74
+1.6% #30Havoc created+5.5% #3
Big plays
−0.009 #80Rushing explosiveness−0.062 #102
−0.017 #118Passing explosiveness+0.169 #44
−0.16 #72Open-field yards per rush+0.10 #38
+0.181 #123Pass explosiveness allowed+0.124 #112
Style and schedule
57% #50Run rate58% #44
+1.4 #15Strength of schedule (avg opponent)−6.1 #57
Texas A&M: last 5 games
| W34-7 | Covered | |
| L6-35 | Missed | |
| L21-31 | Missed | |
| W48-20 | Covered | |
| W50-0 | Covered |
Missouri: last 5 games
| W45-17 | Covered | |
| L24-31 | Missed | |
| W27-17 | Missed | |
| W38-21 | Covered | |
| W54-14 | Missed |
Rating trend
BEAVER Stats: net EPA per play against an average team, entering each weekTA&MMIZ
Loading the thread…
No box score for this game yet.
Closing lines
the last line before kickoff| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | MIZ −3.5 | 50.5 | TA&M +170 · MIZ −205 |
| BEAVER fair line | MIZ −2.4 | 49.2 | TA&M +127 · MIZ −127 |
Loading…
Tendencies
Season to date. Against the spread and over/under use closing lines.| TA&M | MIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-4 | Record | 5-2 |
| 1-4 | Conference | 2-2 |
| 4-1 | Home | 4-0 |
| 0-3 | Away | 1-2 |
| 4-4 | Against the spread | 3-4 |
| 3-5 | Over/under | 3-4 |
| 28.2 / 18.9 | Points for / against | 31.1 / 19.6 |
| +9.4 | Avg margin | +11.6 |
| -3.6 | Avg vs. the spread | +0.5 |
| 59.8 | Plays per game (excl. garbage time) | 62.0 |











